Рейтинг@Mail.ru
Костылева Светлана Юрьевна Институт высшего образования в контексте экономического развития
ИНСТИТУТ ВЫСШЕГО ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ В КОНТЕКСТЕ ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКОГО РАЗВИТИЯ
 
HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTE IN THE CONTEXT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
 
Костылева Светлана Юрьевна,
кандидат экономических наук
Тамбовский филиал Российской академии народного хозяйства и
государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации,
г. Тамбов, Россия
Kostyleva Svetlana Y.,
Ph.D. in Economics
Tambov branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of
National Economy and Public Administration,
Tambov, Russia
E-mail: Этот адрес электронной почты защищен от спам-ботов. У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для просмотра.
 
УДК 330.341
 
Аннотация: Дано обоснование экономического механизма политики модернизации отечественного профессионального образования.
Ключевые слова: институт высшего образова­ния; модернизация; экономический механизм; экономический рост.
Abstract: The paper proves the economic mechanism of the modernization policy of national vocational education.
Key words: higher education institute; modernization; economic mechanism; economic growth.
 
In the last decade, the reform of higher school concerned content modernization of vocational education; much has been done for improving its quality, integration of the Russian professional education into the international educational space.
According to the data recorded in the state program of the Russian Federation "Education Development for 2013-2020" the level of education of the population in Russia is one of the highest in the world. The share of uneducated population and those who have only primary general education is less than 2% (one of the lowest among the countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development - OECD). With regard to general education of the population aged 7 to 17 years (99.8%), Russia is superior to most OECD countries. In terms of population with higher education Russia corresponds to the average for the OECD countries [1].
The basic goals of the state policy in the field of education are as follows [1]:
1) ensuring high quality education in Russia to meet the changing needs of the population and future-oriented objectives of Russian society and economy development;
2) improving the efficiency of the youth policy implementation for innovative socially oriented development of the country.
They lay emphasis to the necessity of the development of modern, effective education systems to meet the challenges of the global innovation society. In this regard, proving the economic mechanism of modernization policy of national vocational education is of great importance.
Education and economy are closely connected: the state of education and its level of development depend on the level of economic development and the state of socio-economic relations, while the quality of education determines the efficiency of the economy. Therefore, the modernization of Russian higher education should be aimed at achieving a modern quality of education adequate to the changing socio-economic conditions and society demands.
Higher education has been covered within various theoretical models [2], but no matter how to treat education - as social significant good or as a pure public good - the level of its development depends on the overall state of the economy, the production sector. The level of development of material production specifies the material and technical base of education, its technical and technological basis and the level of incomes in the economy as a whole, which indirectly affects the structure of employment and the demand for educational services. One of the most important issues is distribution of educational benefits, which is also the way they are provided, and the moment of their production. This problem is tried to decide using R. Coase theorem [9, p. 205-227]. It’s about the criterion of socio-economic efficiency of property distribution, "cost" of distribution relations and industrial relations in general [4, p. 57-62].
According to this theoretical concept, the exchange of property rights causes transaction costs which can be reduced either with the help of the state (centralized way) or creating associations, support groups, voluntary associations, etc. If there is an intense redistribution of the powers, property itself, the costs increase. This has a strong impact on the distribution of narrow resources in accordance with the specified goals, the structure of production and efficiency of its operation. These conditions imply the primary goal - reducing transaction costs by means of creating an appropriate institutional structure.
Let’s consider economic instruments and prospects of higher school modernization. Education reform carried out in Russia includes several key points:
- formation of flexible, accountable to society system of continuing vocational education which develop human potential providing current and future needs of socio-economic development of the Russian Federation;
- development of infrastructure and organizational and economic mechanisms;
- creation of modern Quality Assessment System of education at a basis of such principles as openness, fairness, transparency, social and professional participation;
- providing an effective system of young people socialization and self-fulfilling, development of young people potential.
In addition, the reform involves the use of new mechanisms for education financing: federal budget expenditures for the period up to 2020 will amount to about 4 trillion rubles. At the same time the annual budget expenditures will increase from 446 billion in 2013 to 631 billion in 2020. Thus the consolidated education budget planned for the period up to 2015 is about 8 trillion rubles, and the forecast for 2016 and 2020 is more than 20 trillion rubles. This is absolutely comparable with the expenses for the defense development [11].
Under the conditions of a globalized economy, increasing competitiveness of domestic economy, new challenges of technological development, the need to ensure the development of promising directions in science, technology and engineering in the Russian Federation, indicated critical technologies of the Russian Federation [8], the primary task is the innovative education development.
This task can be accomplished through a number of activities:
- support for regional complex programs of vocational education development aimed at achieving the strategic goals of innovation development and stimulating interaction of science institutions, higher, secondary and primary vocational education, Russian and foreign companies in terms of common projects and programs;
- staff training, which should be mainly carried out in priority areas of modernization and technological development of the Russian economy;
- providing educational institutions of vocational training with modern training and production, computer hardware and software, introducing an advanced-education programs and educational technology, arranging training courses in the leading Russian and foreign educational centers, involving associations of employers and business organizations, which have a demand for graduates of vocational education institutions;
- solving the problem of academic mobility of students and teachers, allowing to provide new levels of interaction between various educational and economic systems, attracting professionals from the real sectors of economy to teach in a higher school;
- cooperation of vocational training institutions with the environment that will promote the formation of stable two-way connection on employment of graduates and support the processes of continuing education for corporate employees.
Budget funding of higher education institutes should enhance the effectiveness of the education economy and come into being through implementation of: 1) public-private partnership mechanisms ensuring effective financing of education; 2) mechanisms and models of economic self-sufficiency of educational institutions.
There are many complexities in discussing the economic aspects of the higher vocational education modernization. Some economic issues, such as introduction of a new financial mechanism, providing access to education, liquidation of tutoring and others, are usually discussed in the context of anticorruption and decrease of "gray" economy influence in education.
Transformation of mechanisms for the implementation of constitutional guarantees in the area of education should be combined with the creation of economic conditions, allowing citizens to be consumers of the benefits of higher vocational education beyond the state guarantees due to their income.
The economic and technologically developed countries have increased the potential of their educational infrastructure for the last 10-15 years (technical ability to accept a certain number of learners at different levels of education), they have also increased access to education by a factor of 1.5-2. In Russia, the educational infrastructure is still morally obsolete and, as a consequence, it is reducing. Therefore, an important socio-economic aspect, according to the high-priority national project "Education", is the economic support of innovative higher schools. The competition of innovative higher schools encourages commitment of vocational education to the regional economy and to staffing needs of a particular region.
 
Список использованных источников:
 
1. Государственная программа Российской Федерации «Развитие образования» на 2013–2020 годы. URL: http://events.informika.ru/phpp/files/news/news/d6/59/66/gosprogramma_razvitie_obrazovaniya_proekt (Дата обращения: 17.12.2015).
2. Блауг М. Методология экономической науки или как экономисты объясняют : пер. с англ. / Марк Блауг ; под ред. Автономова. М.: НП «Журнал Вопросы экономики», 2004. 415 с.
3. Джонстоун Д.Б. Система высшего образования в США: структура, руководство, финансирование / Д.Б. Джонстоун // Унив. упр.: практика и анализ. 2003. № 5–6 (28). С. 92–102.
4. Ельмеев, В.Я. Социология собственности / В.Я. Ельмеев, Е.Е. Тарандо. СПб. : Изд-во С.-Петерб. гос. ун-та, 2000. 88 с.
5. Концепция участия Российской Федерации в управлении государственными организациями, осуществляющими деятельность в сфере образования. URL: http://usu.urfu.ru/usu/opencms/today/docs/federal/conception_ed.rtf (Дата обращения: 17.12.2015).
6. Концепции Федеральной целевой программы развития образования на 2011–2015 годы. URL: http://правительство.рф/media/2011/2/23/39136/file/163-pril.doc (Дата обращения: 17.12.2015).
7. Маркуччи, П.Н. Политика платы за обучение в сравнительной перспективе: теоретические и политические обоснования / П.Н. Маркуччи, Д.Б. Джонстоун // Унив. упр.: практика и анализ. 2004. № 3(31). С. 81–88.
8. Утверждены приоритетные направления развития науки, технологий и техники в Российский Федерации. URL: http://президент.рф/news/11861 (Дата обращения 17.12.2015).
9. Стиглиц, Дж.Ю. Экономика государственного сектора : пер. с англ. / Дж.Ю. Стиглиц. М.: Изд-во Моск. ун-та : ИНФРА-М, 1997. 718 с.
10. Статистика российского образования. URL: http://stat.edu.ru/stat/soc_ek_obr.shtml (Дата обращения: 17.12.2015).
11. Стенограмма заседания Правительства России 11 октября 2012 года. URL: http://правительство.рф/docs/21107/ (Дата обращения: 17.12.2015).