Шуклинова Марина Валерьевна,
кандидат социологических наук
Тамбовский филиал Российской академии народного хозяйства
и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации,
г. Тамбов, Россия
Shuklinova Marina V.,
Ph.D. in Sociology
Tambov branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National
Economy and Public Administration,
Tambov, Russia
E-mail:  Этот адрес электронной почты защищен от спам-ботов. У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для просмотра.
УДК 316.7
Аннотация: В статье рассматриваются научные подходы к исследованию национально-культурной идентичности. Приводится авторская методика исследования национально-культурной идентичности.
Ключевые слова: этно-культурная идентичность, этнос, культура, социологические и социально-психологические методики, Россия, русский народ, русская культура.
Abstract: The article considers scientific approaches to national and cultural identity research. It offers the author’s technique of studying this issue.
Key words: ethno-cultural identity, ethnicity, culture, social and socio-psychological techniques, Russia, the Russians, Russian culture.
Today it is obvious that the society transition to the post-industrial stage of its development, the formation of a new system of social networks and relationships, changes in the structure and significance of the fundamental values are accompanied by loss of human ideas about who he is according to his social and ethnic status, his aesthetic and moral principles. The development of one-dimensional person, who H. Marcuse wrote about, with his fuzzy thoughts of his social, ethnic, religious and cultural background; and the global village, where most residents perceive themselves as citizens of the world are interpreted by many researchers as indicators of the critical point, which was reached by the civilization aimed at achievement of the highest efficiency and unlimited power over the nature. Paraphrasing F. Nietzsche we can say that today we are witnessing not only the death of God, but also of a man, as it is evidenced by both the results of numerous studies of psychologists, sociologists, philosophers, and social practices. It is of great importance to find out how far this process has gone, and to what extent the apocalyptic predictions of E. Fromm and M. McLuhan, E. Erikson and F. Fukuyama, A. Camus and M. Foucault and many other representatives of domestic and foreign social thought are justified.
Answers to these questions have special significance in connection with the global processes that are taking place in the world. The main effects of these processes cannot be reduced only to free movement of goods, resources, finance, labour, etc. on a global scale, but they also lead to formation of the mono-cultural world based on universalized values. Globalization is accompanied by the destruction of local cultures as national customs and traditions are an obstacle in the way of rapid economic growth and development. In this case, these processes become a serious challenge for the traditional national culture. Therefore, in a globalizing world, national and cultural identity becomes a major theme of both science and everyday life. As prof. D. Stepanovich-Zaharievskaya rightly notes ‘the main question is not how to avoid the interpenetration of cultures (it's impossible), but how to enter into the process of global change in the cultural map of the world (society) without losing the originality, uniqueness and recognition?’ [1, p. 99].
In addition, the transitional society is a unique ground for empirical studies of those phenomena, which are latent and difficult to fix under the conditions of stability. It is also important to note that the concept of identity is used rather recently, but quite frequently in Russian sociology. Nowadays there are many publications on this subject; the study of identity has become one of the priorities. Well-known Western conceptions and methods are being tested.
Now we are going to consider some approaches and methods used by both Russian and foreign authors to determine social, cultural and ethnic identities.
In the study called ‘Soviet mentality in the Russian consciousness’ Z.V. Sikevich used a number of techniques to fix the ethnic identity [2]. Due to the fact that ethnicity refers in the author’s opinion to intimate manifestations of the human psyche, which to our mind is quite debatable, Sikevich offers the projective technique, which gives a large variety of material for the study. The method involves formulating projective questions that simulate a situation, which is probable for the respondent, who is offered to assume his actions in this situation. For example, a participant is asked to imagine that he was not born Russian, but French or American. The question is whether he is happy with such ethnic metamorphosis or not? The author emphasizes that on the one hand, the projective situation is a kind of sociological game in which the respondent is gladly included; on the other hand, this procedure helps to discover the unconscious and symbolic.
It should be noted that the use of projective techniques in the study of such complex phenomena as ethnic identity is justified, because the techniques makes it possible to get information about those plants or motives, the information on which is distorted when direct research procedures are used.
Open-ended questions (questions without prior answers) are used along with projective questions. The respondent has a possibility of free expression on the topic that helps the researchers to expand and structure deep layers of the human psyche, which is usually lost because of prompt answers.
Some elements of folk art are also used as instruments. According to the author proverbs and sayings generate that concentrated image of the symbolic reality, which promotes awareness of the ethnic identity. The researcher points out that when a respondent adapts “popular wisdom” to himself, his attitudes and behavioural reactions, he unknowingly fixes his own ethno psychological specificity.
For example, respondents were asked to name a favourite proverb, which they try to correspond in their behaviour. Among them there were “He who would catch fish must not mind getting wet”, “Patience and hard work bring success”, etc. According to the analysis, it was concluded that attitude toward hard work and patience prevailed in group consciousness. The study also highlighted the proverbs as indicators of the ethnic stereotype, and as indicators of the normative behaviour dynamics.
It is necessary to note that this type of procedure in our opinion is of conditional and subjective character, since it does not give an opportunity to identify prevailing aims and value orientations of individuals. For example, there are two Russian sayings: “He who would catch fish must not mind getting wet” and “Work isn't a wolf that will run away in the woods”, which prevent from determining the setting which people are guided by in their behaviour.
Another author, T.Z. Kozlova [3] used the methodology developed by M. Kuhn and T. McPartland, called the test ‘Who am I?’ to determine the identity of certain social groups. The essence of this method was reflected in the respondent's instruction: ‘On this page you can see 20 numbered blank lines. Please, write on each of them an answer to a simple question – ‘Who am I in the society?’ Write 20 different nouns (you may use a noun with an adjective, such as ‘a good man’). Answer as if you answer yourself and not someone else. Place the answers in the order they occur. Do not worry about their logicality. Write quickly, because your time is limited.’
Thus, according to the degree of ethnic I expression the national identity could have from 1 to 20th place. Based on this they concluded if the ethnic status was important or not for the respondent.
Coding of answers was carried out according to the classification. The latest was developed based on two classes of respondents’ answers: ‘I myself’ (personal identification) and ‘I'm in a group’ (social identification). It was finally obtained 23 nominations in each class. In the context of national and cultural identity study, the following group identifications were of great important: ethnicity, identification with the people of the country, identification with the humanity, identification with the homeland.
It is important to note that this method is not very effective in the study of national and cultural identity, as there may be a situation where respondents may not even include a reference to their national identity in the proposed structure. It was proved by the results of the mass interviews with the usage of this method in 1994-1995. The project was called ‘National identity, nationalism and conflict management in the Russian Federation’, where references to the nationality occurred in 12-13% of all respondents’ answers [4].
The Incomplete Sentences Technique was used by the staff group of General and Educational Psychology Institute (S. Klimova, I. Krokhin, E. Zotova) aimed at studying social identification in terms of social changes (1992-1993) [5].
According to this method, the survey participants were asked to finish some sentences expressing their living position verbally. Instruments included two sets of questions: ideas about the social structure of society and a strategy how to succeed in life. To clarify the first set of questions (we are interested only in it), the respondent was asked to complete the following phrases: ‘People in our city are divided into...’ The study showed that stratification by ethnicity was in the third place of importance among respondents, which pointed out the actualization of national identity.
In our opinion, this technique is applicable to the study of national and cultural identity, as the respondent has a possibility of free expression on the subject that helps to reveal and structure deep layers of the human psyche, which are usually lost due to answers-hints.
In the context of the project ‘National identity, nationalism and conflict management in the Russian Federation. 1993-1995’, the authors group (L.M. Drobizheva, A.V. Aklaev, G.U. Soldatov and others) [6] developed tools exploring ethnic identity at three levels:
1) The study of collective group self-image as a multiple identity and the importance of group ethnic identity in this structure.
2) The study of ethnic identity as a result of socio-psychological, emotional-cognitive and value processes of ethnic identification and ethnic differentiation.
3) The study of trends in the formation of ethnic identity and relevant behavioural reactions in ethno-conflict situation.
Considering the ethnic identity in the context of inter-ethnic relations, the authors investigated its transformation through the most important socio-psychological characteristics and processes of external and internal group interaction:
a) trends in the formation of ethnic identity in the context of inter-ethnic interaction;
b) ethnic stereotypes and values;
c) the degree of ethnic tolerance;
d) indicators of aggression;
d) the level of general social frustration and frustration due to inter-ethnic issues;
e) the intensity of the ethnicity need;
g) behaviour in situations connected with ethnic differences and conflicts;
h) psychological distance.
The first level studied the structure of the collective group self-image and the importance of ethnicity in this structure with the help of M. Kuhn and T. McPartland’s test ‘Who am I?’ in a modified form. Respondents were asked to give five answers to the question ‘Who am I?’
The study of ethnic affiliative tendencies was based on the special methodological development ‘Ethnic affiliation.’ There were 9 pairs selected according to the value judgments based on the opposition of group orientation and personality orientation.
Besides the meaningful basis of ethnic solidarity and the most important parameters of ethnic identity were clarified with the following questions: ‘What unites you with people of your nationality?’, ‘In what situations do you feel the nation affiliations most strongly?’
The answers to the first question were language, culture, native environment, national psychology and ethnicity. The answers to the second question included religiosity (going to the temple), political actions, culture, and historical memory.
G.U. Soldatova [7] and the group of researchers developed a number of techniques for ethnic identity fixation, such as the diagnostic test of the ratio (DTR). DTR is an original modification of the semantic differential method, which studies an emotional and evaluative component of the ethnic stereotype.
The scales were determined in the following way: they offered two antonyms such as generous – greedy, and only one quality could be selected, the counterbalance here was economical.
DTR makes it possible to measure such parameters of ethnic stereotypes as ambivalence, expressiveness, direction. Their quantitative indicators are seen as empirical indicators of emotional-evaluative component of ethnic stereotypes.
Another technique used in the above study is a modified test of Kelly constructs. This technique helps to identify latent variables of implicit theories not only in the individual level but in the level of the entire ethnic group too. The main idea of the method is that human perception and interpretation of the external world phenomena takes place on the basis of available system of parameters for comparison of people and events among themselves. Each system of parameters is a bipolar rating scale: good – evil, cheerful – grim, etc.
The respondent took cards with the words ‘I am’, ‘typical Russian’, ‘typical Georgian,’ etc. They were also offered cards with some names and surnames of people with different nationalities from the respondent’s first-hand environment (e.g., a student group, a staff group). The list could include two sociometric people (positive and negative) who belonged to the same nationality and environment as the respondent. Additionally, there could be included sociometric choice of other nationalities. This made it possible to compare identification features with other ethnic groups and identification with positive and negative members in the view of respondents.
The above set of techniques made it possible to solve a wide range of tasks associated with the ethnic identity. This set helped to fix the latent characteristics associated with the structures of national identity to reveal the hidden motives and attitudes. However, these techniques did not take into account the cultural component in the identification process and besides they were quite time-consuming, so it was difficult to use them in the study of national and cultural identity.
Studying Bashkortostan students F.S. Faizullin and A.Y. Zaripov (Sociological laboratory of USATU) [8] identified 10 indicators, which fixed the motivation types of the ethnic identity:
– indicator of the total area of residence as ethno consolidating factor;
– personal identification according to the parents’ nationality;
– language and culture;
– nation history;
– common customs and traditions;
– sense of the hometown;
– will to freedom and independence;
– great representatives of one’s people;
– religion;
– ability to work.
It is important to emphasize that the indicators were arranged in this order of importance by the respondents, who mentioned their place of residence, parents, language and culture first of all.
In 1997 The Center of Sociological Studies of Lomonosov Moscow State University and the Center for the Study of International Relations of N.N. Miklukho-Maklai Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology [9] conducted a nationwide survey, which recorded the ethnic identity of Russian youth in the Russian Federation. The respondents answered the following questions:
1) The question determining the degree of actualization of ethnic identity among young people. ‘To what extent is your nationality significant for you?’ (Possible answers: very significant, significant, not very significant, not significant at all, it’s difficult to answer).
2) The question determining the degree of involvement of the Russian respondents to the problem of inter-ethnic relations. ‘To what extent are you concerned about the problem of inter-ethnic relations in your area?’ (Possible answers: I care about it very much, I likely care about it, I care about it not so much, I don’t care about it at all, it’s difficult to answer).
3) The question clarifying the issue of ethnic tolerance. ‘Is there any nationalities, representatives of which cause your negative attitude?’ (Possible answers: yes, no, it’s difficult to answer, I refuse to answer).
4) The question clarifying the content of another nationality rejection and identifying the limits of the potential destruction. Respondents were asked to express their attitude towards the statement ‘People of some nationalities are better than others by nature’ (Possible answers: I totally agree, I quite agree, I quite disagree, I strongly disagree, it’s difficult to answer).
The analysis results were divided into two groups:
The first group of respondents considered ethnicity to be an important factor in identifying and did not agree with the fact that ‘Some ethnic groups are better than others by nature’ – this is an indicator of positive ethnic identity. The second group recognized the importance of ethnicity and agreed with the thesis that ‘some ethnic groups are better than others by nature’ – this is an indicator of negative ethnic identity.
5) The question, which fixes ethno psychological attitude of young Russians. The survey participants were asked to express their attitude towards the statement ‘When people of different nationalities live side by side, the society becomes richer’ (Possible answers: totally agree, quite agree, quite disagree, strongly disagree, difficult to answer).
E.N. Danilova [10] revealed a hierarchy of preferences in the mass consciousness of Russians based on empirical public opinion monitoring (regular since 1992), which contained a set of questions relating to socio-group identification. The question was formulated as follows: ‘How often do you feel closeness to different groups of people, addressing to whom you can say that they are you?’ The scale of answers: often, sometimes, never. Among the groups, there were people of the same family, age, profession, nationality, income. Besides there were groups of people who shared the same outlook on life, had the same income, believed in the future, those who determined their fate and some others.
According to six measurements, the primary groups dominated over the secondary ones in the sphere of identification preferences of Russians.
Estonian researchers T. Vihalemm and V. Kalmus [11], studying the mental resources of different ethnic groups and generations in Estonian society, defined ethnic identity of different social groups by means of the question ‘Are you similar to the following people, so that in respect of them and yourself you can say we?’ Multiple-choice questions included different categories, and the respondent chose the most appropriate of them. As a result of the factor analysis they defined the following structure of identity:
– Subcultural identity (fixes relations to the group membership, based on the preferences of the same life style).
– Network identity (identification with the family, friends, relatives, colleagues and ethnic group).
– Trans-national and civic identity (identification with Europeans, humanity and people of the same nationality).
– Identity with the local community (identification with neighbours, residents of the city, other ethnic groups).
To determine a correlation between different types of identity and respondents’ value orientations, the researchers used 25 value indicators (a way of measuring created by M. Rukich), which were measured on the five-point scale (from unimportant to very important). The following structure of value orientations was defined: personal harmony, spiritual harmony, environment and safety, material well-being, social maturity.
As a result of using this approach a list of summary mental structures of values and identities was defined. Among them, there was adaptation to the transitional period, technological resources and territorial openness, social integration, well-being and consumerism, religiousness, tolerance.
In our opinion, this procedure is an original approach, using which you can solve a wide range of tasks related to ethnic identity. It reveals mental structures of various social groups, generational differences between the major ethnic groups and cultural patterns that favor the reproduction of social capital of the society.
The technique of studying ethnic identity of students used by the Lithuanian researchers D. Antinene, G. Myarkis, R. Lekavichene [12] is also interesting. To determine the structure of the total identity they used the method of multidimensional scales – MDS. MDS model included three scales that reflect the traditional views of ethnic identity: ethnocentrism, nationalism and consistent and rational view of national self-determination, as well as two scales which reflected modern views: cosmopolitanism and reflective and democratic view of the national identity. The abscissa x measured social acceptability and the ordinate y measured – cosmopolitanism versus nationalism. Thus, they obtained the gradation model of ethnic self-identification of students in Lithuania.
To summarize the methods analysis used for fixing ethnic and cultural identities, we should note that none of the existing methods is able to cover and measure cultural identity to the full, let alone most of them are very time-consuming. In addition, there is no complex technique that studies cultural identity on the basis of two characteristics.
Developing the research methods it must be assumed that the process of identifying an individual with his ethnicity and culture should be fixed at cognitive, emotional and behavioural levels. It is also necessary to develop indicators, which help to fix the level of national and cultural identity from the surface to the depths. To do this it is necessary to use sociological, socio-psychological techniques identifying interior attitudes and value orientation, which define semantic constructs of personality that can determine behaviour in the national culture.
The tools for the study of national and cultural identity should be fixed on three levels:
– The surface level. (National and cultural identity is weak here. People number themselves among representatives of a particular ethnic group on the basis of cognitive elements.)
– The medium level. (It is deeper than the first one. A man numbers himself among representatives of a particular ethnic group, because he feels an inseparable connection with it. Emotional element takes place here.)
– The deep level, characterized by a high degree of national and cultural identity. (On this level there is a complex set of strong-willed, sensual, emotional feelings connected with belonging to a certain ethnic group and culture.)
The first-level indicators are the desire of an individual to form his national identity, the degree of interest in the national literature, cinema, related to citizenship, etc. The second level indicators are following one’s traditions, customs, a desire to live in the country, realization of the country and people role in the world community, etc. The third level indicators are a sense of discomfort in a foreign cultural environment, a willingness to sacrifice one’s life for the motherland, nostalgia for the homeland, even under the circumstances of a short outgo from the country, etc.
Developed tools should include six units of questions: the unit of clarifying the social well-being, the unit of value judgments, the unit of projective situations, the unit of incomplete sentences, the semantic differential, the socio-demographic unit and a list of questions designed to identify the levels of national and cultural identity, and the intensity of its manifestations.
The introductory unit aimed at identifying the social well-being includes eight questions relating to the overall assessment of the situation in the country, assessment of family financial position, economic and political situation in the country, one’s future and one’s family future, etc.
The unit of value judgments reveals emotional level of national and cultural identity, including feelings and emotions caused by the realization of one’s ethnicity. The unit includes 14 beliefs touching upon various aspects of national and cultural identity. Almost every opinion has a polar pair such as ‘the Russians – the great nation’ – ‘the Russians – backward people, slaves by nature’ that helps to get more accurate information. The following indicators of national and cultural identity are defined in the unit: an individual’s patriotic attitude, attitude to the Russians and Russian culture, awareness of the contribution of Russian culture and science in the development of world civilization, cosmopolitan spirit, and individualistic beliefs.
Besides emotional level of national and cultural identity is clarified with a semantic differential test. This technique makes it possible to reveal hidden attitude of respondents to a specified object. The person under test is asked to express his attitude to such objects as Russia, Russian culture, Russians. Each object has ten polar characteristics.
The object Russian culture contains the following characteristics: complex – simple, native – stranger, great – insignificant, unique – ordinary, etc. The characteristics were chosen to identify not only emotional attitude to the object (I like – I do not like), but the degree of national and cultural identity. Individual awareness of one’s culture as a great and unique, the feelings of kinship with it indicate a high degree of identity at the verbal level. The object a Russian man also identifies an autostereotype which exists in the mass consciousness at the moment. Respondents estimated ten qualities of a Russian man: conscientious – shameless, kind – angry, truth lover – liar, hardworking – lazy, etc.
If the respondent has a positive attitude to the object, its assessment was focused on the positive end of the scale. The position of zero said that the respondent had difficulty to express his point of view on the characteristic.
The test of incomplete sentences belongs to the class of projective techniques, it reveals hidden depths beliefs, sensemaking structures, dominant motives, individual interests, resulting from the association about the given stimuli. In our technique we developed seven sentences that identify the degree of national and cultural identity on the cognitive and emotional level. The respondent had to complete the following sentences:
1. Russian culture is one of the cultures which...
2. The Russian man is the one who...
3. If he does not know the customs of his people he is...
4. If he does not know Russian classical literature he is...
5. For me, the most significant event in the history of Russia is...
6. In determining a person's nationality the main thing is...
7. The citizen of Russia sounds...
The first sentence reveals the degree of the individual’s awareness of Russian culture place in the world, its importance. The second sentence clarifies the nature of Russian identity and the set of ethno consolidating signs. The third one defines the individuals’ orientation toward maintaining relations with the generations and the integrity of the ethnic and cultural continuity. The fourth sentence is aimed at clarifying the importance of cultural heritage in the form of Russian classical literature. The fifth sentence fixes an event which is considered to be significant in Russian history. The sixth sentence determines a set of ethno differentiating signs. And the seventh one determines respondents' attitudes to the citizenship.
The result of analyzing respondents' answers is a conclusion about the extent of national and cultural identity and the level of its manifestation.
Another projective technique was the projective questions technique. Using this technique it is possible to determine situational attitudes and ulterior motives, which help to predict the individual’s specific actions. The projective questions will also fix the degree of national and cultural identity, which is manifested in real actions. Respondents were offered five situations close to the current reality.
In the first case it was a question about the readiness of the respondents to live in their country, even if they had problems: ‘Imagine that you have been made a good offer, which will solve all your problems soon. However you have to move to another country for a long period. How will you react to this offer?’ In this case, the respondent has a choice to accept the offer or reject it.
The second situation clarifies the respondents’ willingness to defend the homeland with lethal force. Possible answers are ‘I will go as a volunteer or I will leave the country’. Choosing the answer ‘I will go as a volunteer’ the respondent shows a high degree of identification with the people, culture and demonstrates the deep level of national and cultural identity.
In the following case, the respondents choose the nationality of their child: ‘As you know, in accordance with the US law, any child born in the US automatically acquires the citizenship of this country. Imagine the situation: You are in a long trip with your family in the US, and your baby is born there. What citizenship will you take out for your child?’ The alternative answers are as follows: a Russian citizen, a citizen of the United States.
The fourth situation reveals the respondents’ significance of such a social value as devotion to the Motherland. Imagine the situation: ‘You are involved in court as a juror, and you need to decide ‘guilty – not guilty’ about the act of a man who for the sake of improving his material well-being betrayed some military secrets of Russia. What is your verdict?’ Possible answers: guilty or not guilty.
The last situation determines the respondents’ willingness to assert their ethnic interests in the cultural environment: ‘If you were a resident of another state, where you couldn’t speak your native language, what would you do.’ Alternative answers: a) join the ranks of the protesters; b) agree with the authorities.
It is possible to determine a degree of manifestation and intensity of national and cultural identity emphasizing the following indicators of national and cultural identity:
– The individual’s attitude to documental manifestation of his national identity;
– Attitude to using English words in the Russian language;
– Attitudes towards immigrants;
– Willingness to live in Russia;
– Awareness of a special historical mission of Russia;
– Homesickness;
– The degree of interest in Russian literature and cinema.
Список использованных источников:
1. Степанович-Захариевская Д. Актуальность исследования идентичности в условиях общественной трансформации на Балканах / Д. Степанович-Захариевская // Социологические исследования. 2008. №5. С. 99-104.
2. Сикевич З.В. Социология и психология национальных отношений: учеб. пособ. / З.В. Сикевич. СПб.: Изд-во Михайлова В.А, 1999. С. 162-203.
3. Козлова Т.З. Самоидентификация некоторых социальных групп по тесту «Кто Я» / Т.З. Козлова // Социологические исследования. 1995. №5. С. 102-110.
4. Арутюнян Ю.В. Этносоциология: учеб. пособ. для вузов / Ю.В. Арутюнян. М.: Аспект Пресс, 1999. С. 165.
5. Климова С.Г. Социальная идентификация в условиях общественных перемен / С.Г. Климова // Человек. 1995. №3. С. 38-45.
6. Дробижева Л.М. Демократизация и образы национализма в РФ 90-х гг. / Л.М. Дробижева. М.: Мысль, 1996. С. 296-341.
7. Солдатова Г.У. Психология межэтнической напряженности / Г.У. Солдатова. М.: Смысл, 1998. С. 180-198.
8. Файзуллин Ф.С., Зарипов А.Я. Грани этнической идентификации / Ф.С. Файзуллин, А.Я. Зарипов // Социологические исследования. 1997. №8. С. 40-47.
9. Рязанцев В.В.Молодые русские россияне: особенности государственной и этнической самоидентификации / В.В.Рязанцев // Вестник Моск. Univ. Ser.18. Социология и политология. 1998. №3. С. 150-174.
10. Данилова Е.Н. Идентификационные стратегии: Российский выбор / Е.Н. Данилова // Социологические исследования. 1995. №6. С. 120-130.
11. Вихалемм Т., Калмус В. Дифференциация ментальностей основных этнических групп в Эстонии / Т. Вихалемм, В. Калмус // Социологические исследования. 2008. №1. С. 104-114.
12. Антинене Д., Мяркис, Г., Лекавичене Р. Об этнической самоидентификации студентов Литвы / Д. Антинене, Г. Мяркис, Р. Лекавичене // Социологические исследования. 2008. №1. С. 114-118.