Шуклинова Марина Валерьевна,
кандидат социологических наук
Тамбовский филиал Российской академии народного хозяйства
и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации,
г. Тамбов, Россия
Shuklinova Marina V.,
PhD in Sociology
Tambov branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National
Economy and Public Administration,
Tambov, Russia
E-mail: Этот адрес электронной почты защищен от спам-ботов. У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для просмотра.
УДК 35.08
Аннотация: Рассмотрены процедуры конкурсного отбора персонала государственной службы в Тамбовской области.
Ключевые слова: технологии квалификации, процедуры конкурентного отбора, профессиональное интервью, сотрудники государственной службы.
Abstract: The paper considers competitive selection procedures of civil service staff in Tambov region.
Key words: qualifying technologies, competitive selection procedures, professional interview, civil service staff.
Competitive selection of civil service staff is one of the leading, basic personnel technology. The methods of competitive selection are an issue that is very relevant today. According to the civil service law [1, 2] the arsenal of personnel services has a wide range of selection instruments. However, in practice, not all the methods are widely used for various reasons. First, we should note the skill level of personnel officers, which does not allow implementing new approaches in the qualifying events. Second, stereotypes created in the public service consider recruitment interview as an exhaustive method of personnel selection. Third, there is a complexity and labour-intensiveness of other qualifying technologies. In this regard, it is important to consider the experience of the implementation of the competitive selection procedure in the civil service of Tambov region. The technique was developed by the staff of the State and Municipal Management Department of the First Tambov branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration for Tambov region administration. The purpose of the methodology developing is a universal structured professional interview, which will: 

1) improve the quality and objectivity of the selection events (efficiency is ensured by the presence of a structured scheme);
2) fix real-world knowledge and skills of candidates for the vacant post of region civil service (because it contains "behavioral indicators");
3) make the procedure more intuitive and transparent (each competitor gains a certain amount of points, which allows us to rank the subjects of the most prepared for the least);
4) facilitate the work of the competition committee members for making a more objective and comprehensive assessment of the candidate (members of the competition committee, most of whom are not specialists in the field of personnel management, have the opportunity to assess the candidate on pre-established questions and indicators, comparing the responses with finished scale) .
The professional interview is designed for two categories of state civil service positions "leaders" and "experts." Each category has its own set of issues related to professional knowledge and skills.
According to the developed professional interview all applicants are asked standard, beforehand formulated and the activity related questions. The answers are evaluated on the basis of its content flowing criteria (in points).
The structure of the professional interview is as follows:
Phase number 1. "Introductory unit. Setting the contact".
Phase number 2. "General information".
Phase number 3. "Education".
Phase number 4. "Professional development".
Phase number 5. "The completion of the interview".
The phases indicate the order of transfer from one topic to another. The first phase is getting into contact with the applicant for the vacant position, which allows the candidate to calm down and do not touch on serious topics in the beginning. The second phase "General information” is used at the discretion of the competition committee and aimed at clarifying the information contained in the documents provided by the applicant: marital status, place of residence, and another where it is necessary.
The third phase "Education" is aimed at clarifying the following issues: the education specialization (a topic of the graduate work or thesis carried out during the study), additional training (refresher courses, certifications, internships, seminars, grants), further education plans and more.
The fourth phase of the professional interview called "Professional Development" is the primary and biggest one in the content. The purpose of this phase is finding out if the applicants have necessary knowledge, abilities and skills to get a vacant position. The phase includes the following components:
Unit 1. Understanding the priorities of the state civil service.
Unit 2. Professional knowledge and skills.
Unit 3. Focus on quality and results.
Unit 4. Communication skills.
Unit 5. Motivation for taking up a desired post.
In all the units there are evaluative criteria for the following positions: high (3 points), average (2 points), low (1 point).
The scores of each unit are summed and compared with the final table. As a result, the level of each candidate becomes apparent.
The questions of each unit are summarized in a table, which facilitates the work of the competition committee and makes the results more visible. The main questioned and derived from it additional questions are aimed at estimating the applicants qualities. The set of questions is modified by the members of the competition committee, depending on the situation (goals and objectives of the interview, clearness of the applicants’ answers, their level of preparedness, etc.). In the table of units there is a separate column with the positions "falls short of the requirements", "meets the requirements", "exceeds the requirements." The table also has a column "Notes" which gives members of the competition committee an opportunity to make notes while they are working.
The first unit of the professional phase aims at identifying and understanding the applicants’ specificity and public service priorities. This unit has a particular importance for citizens who wish to get a job in government offices for the first time. In this context, it is important for applicants to recognize the specificity of public service as a special type of professional activity, which functions in clear regulatory framework and has its limitations and prohibitions. The unit contains such questions as:
- What is the difference between public service and other professional activities?
- What features of the legal status of a civil servant can you mention?
- Can you think of any prohibitions and restrictions existing in the public service?
- What social guarantees does a civil servant have?
- What are the main problems solved by the civil service at this stage?
The estimation criteria of the unit " Understanding the priorities of the state civil service " are as follows: "exceeds the requirements" - 3 points (an applicant has a deep understanding of the objectives and priorities of the state civil service, he has an integral view of the public administration system and the principles of its functioning; and he is perfectly good at the legal framework ) "meets the requirements" - 2 points (an applicant has an idea of the main priorities of the state service in the Russian Federation and the government; the knowledge level of the legal framework is satisfactory), "meets the requirements conditionally " - 1 point (an applicant has superficial knowledge at the subject, and no clear understanding of the priorities and objectives of the state civil service, his knowledge of the legislation is unsatisfactory).
The second unit reveals the presence or absence of professional knowledge and skills which are necessary for a desired post.
Among the general requirements there are:
- The academic level (possession of basic theoretical (general and specific) knowledge);
- The training level (possession of basic skills and abilities used for future functions);
- Professional abilities (having abilities (dispositions) to perform certain types of work);
- The level of mastering information technology.
The unit evaluation criteria are the following: high - 3 points, average - 2 points and low level - 1 point.
The third unit of the interview is aimed to find out if the applicants focus on quality and results. For example, during the interview it’s found out that candidates for the vacant posts of state civil service have a professional capacity of solving complex problems, an ability to cope with the work entrusted to them within a set time, to orient correctly and make the best decision in difficult situations, to see a business through.
If a candidate demonstrates a high level of focus on quality and results, it is evident because of independence in working, an ability to orient correctly in a difficult situation, to see a business through. If an applicant demonstrates an average level of focus on quality and results he performs complex tasks with some outside help, sometimes he becomes embarrassed, but he is able to make independent decisions and he is also able to see a business through, but needs to be reminded and controlled. Finally, if an applicant demonstrates a low level of focus on quality and results, he does not know what to do unaided. In case of a difficult situation he is not able to solve a problem himself. He constantly needs the managers reminding and monitoring.
The fourth unit of the interview reveals if a candidate has professional communication skills that become more and more important in the modern conditions. It is connected with the fact that the proportion of communication in the activities of civil servants is constantly increasing: negotiations, meetings, lectures, public events, participation in committees and others require such qualities as the ability to work together, to negotiate, to work with people, to listen, to accept someone else's point of view, etc.
The evaluation criteria for this unit are strong, middle or weak, which reflect the degrees of communicative qualities.
The fifth unit "Motivation for taking up a desired post" completes the professional phase of the interview. This unit allows the committee to identify the level of interest in filling posts and motivational profile of the candidates.
The evaluation criteria of this unit include:
- “High level” - when the candidate is well-versed in the subject of his future activity, he shows high interest in filling posts, clearly distinguishes the benefits of the new positions compared to the previous one; the candidate is motivated to fulfil his potential for achieving objectives of the authority.
- “Medium” – the candidate has satisfactory knowledge in the subject of his future activity; he shows interest in filling posts; his motivational profile is aimed at both opening his own potential and to meet the material needs; he sees some difficulties in execution of office.
- “Low level” – the candidate has weak knowledge in the subject of his future activity, the level of interest in filling posts is not clearly defined; his motivation is vague.
For convenient selection of candidates, the members of the competition committee get the final summary table in which they give grades for each unit and applicant and thus they get the total score. This table allows to evaluate the quality of the contestants and to identify the worthies one by ranking.
The professional interview finishes with the fifth phase where they draw conclusions give the summary, specify further actions and thank for the interview. Finally, we should note that in practice the procedure of competitive selection for civil service of Tambov region has proven itself as an effective tool of personnel work.


1. О государственной гражданской службе Российской Федерации: федер. закон: принят Гос. Думой 27 июля 2004 г. №79-ФЗ. М.: Ось-89, 2004. 64 с.
2. О конкурсе на замещение вакантной должности государственной гражданской службы Российской Федерации: Указ Президента Российской Федерации № 112 от 01 февраля 2005 г. // Рос. газ. 2005. 03 февраля.